Asylum Seeker stole iPads with folieinklädd bag at Media Markt
Current All chronicles of Jack London Best results Concerned Nässjöbos all opinion articles and chronicles the Day Nuheters all headlines Dom B 2354-11 A very "lazy dog" to simplify botaniseringen on Exposed Leaflet Printing Comment Policy Contact CRIB TO WRITE ARTICLES range cookers Loognas entire friend list About Exposed Home Question of the Week and results We tip
The rejected range cookers asylum seekers Avetik Petrosyan, who lied and claimed to come from Chechnya in Russia but after investigation found to have Armenian citizenship and then you get another chance to stay, stole a specially equipped bag two iPads at Media Markt.
Theft, Deed: Petrosyan has wrongfully taken two Ipads that belonged to Media Markt. It happened May 25, 2013 in Media Markt stores in Kalmar. To grip meant harm. Petrosyan committed the offense with intent to steal.
Avetik Petrosyans recognition is supported by the facts of the case. The deed is thereby strengthened, and the indictment is to be classified in ways prosecutor stated. The indictment is proved. Forfeiture claim, which is legally range cookers founded and admitted, should be rejected.
Of the Migration Board's opinion dated September 2, 2013 shows that Avetik range cookers Petrosyan applied for asylum February 22, 2011 and that he claimed to be resident in Chechnya, Russia. Migration Board rejected the application May 12, 2011 and decided to turn him into Russia. The decision won by appeals final.
On 10 May 2012 the Migration Board to suspend the execution of the deportation order, and that as admissible a basic case concerning residence and work permits, as it emerged that Avetik Petrosyan were Armenian citizens. On February 20, 2013 held Migration Board an asylum investigation with Avetik Petrosyan. The Swedish Migration range cookers Board has not yet taken any decision on the issue of a need for protection exists against Armenia in Avetik Petrosyan range cookers case.
Of Forensic Medicine opinion dated 15 October 2013 shows that Avetik Petrosyan was not severely mentally disturbed in the act, nor in time of the survey. According Forensic Medicine assessment, there is no reason for a psychiatric evaluation for a decision on the issue of prison prohibited or position on the issue of forensic psychiatric care.
Probation Service has in the opinions held that the existence of a surveillance needs but proposed that the probation is not imposed because it is not clear that Avetik Petrosyan should stay in Sweden. Probation then found Avetik Petrosyan as unsuitable for community service range cookers because of lack of knowledge in Swedish and English. Avetik Petrosyan has at trial indicated that he has been granted a residence permit and that his partner is expecting a baby soon. Avetik Petrosyan has further stated that he intends to stay in Sweden and that he agrees to community service.
Avetik Petrosyan is 32 years old and he is present in the four sections of the criminal record. He was sentenced Jan. 9, 2013 to a suspended sentence coupled with fines for support (2012-10-10) and shoplifting (2012-10-10). On 26 February 2013 he was sentenced for theft (2012-07-04), said it was ordained that the previously imposed probation would also relate range cookers to the new crime. Other sections are irrelevant to the sanction assessing this question.
Store Theft is not a so-called artbrott and the district court makes no other assessment of the present theft, although Avetik Petrosyan used a folieinklädd bag at the grip. Penalty value corresponds to jail for a month. Crime type and penalty speaks thus not to prison should be selected as a penalty, which however can be the case in similar crime does.
According to the Supreme Court, the criteria for probation are perceived so that probation range cookers is excluded only if there is absolutely no reason to suppose that the sentence may help the accused refrain from further crime (cf. NJA 2000 p 314 and NJA 2008 p 359). Avetik Petrosyan suffer from certain physical diseases and mental disorders. (That is, those where we get to Sweden, ed nam). It is obvious that there is a correlation between Avetik Petrosyans social situation and his crime.
Through the findings of the district court finds common ground that there is no impediment to the execution of a sentence of probation and that a significant improvement occurred by Avetik Petrosyans social situation. At a cumulative assessment considers range cookers the district court that the reasons for probation outweighs the reason for imprisonment (relapse). Penalty should be under the specified conditions specified separately to probation. range cookers
Kalmar District Court sentenced: Avetik Petrosyan, 810,965, address, Karlskrona. Citizens range cookers of Armenia with interpreter needs in Armenian. For theft to probation. Prosecutor Kjell Janneson urged NOT to deportation Goal
Current All chronicles of Jack London Best results Concerned Nässjöbos all opinion articles and chronicles the Day Nuheters all headlines Dom B 2354-11 A very "lazy dog" to simplify botaniseringen on Exposed Leaflet Printing Comment Policy Contact CRIB TO WRITE ARTICLES range cookers Loognas entire friend list About Exposed Home Question of the Week and results We tip
The rejected range cookers asylum seekers Avetik Petrosyan, who lied and claimed to come from Chechnya in Russia but after investigation found to have Armenian citizenship and then you get another chance to stay, stole a specially equipped bag two iPads at Media Markt.
Theft, Deed: Petrosyan has wrongfully taken two Ipads that belonged to Media Markt. It happened May 25, 2013 in Media Markt stores in Kalmar. To grip meant harm. Petrosyan committed the offense with intent to steal.
Avetik Petrosyans recognition is supported by the facts of the case. The deed is thereby strengthened, and the indictment is to be classified in ways prosecutor stated. The indictment is proved. Forfeiture claim, which is legally range cookers founded and admitted, should be rejected.
Of the Migration Board's opinion dated September 2, 2013 shows that Avetik range cookers Petrosyan applied for asylum February 22, 2011 and that he claimed to be resident in Chechnya, Russia. Migration Board rejected the application May 12, 2011 and decided to turn him into Russia. The decision won by appeals final.
On 10 May 2012 the Migration Board to suspend the execution of the deportation order, and that as admissible a basic case concerning residence and work permits, as it emerged that Avetik Petrosyan were Armenian citizens. On February 20, 2013 held Migration Board an asylum investigation with Avetik Petrosyan. The Swedish Migration range cookers Board has not yet taken any decision on the issue of a need for protection exists against Armenia in Avetik Petrosyan range cookers case.
Of Forensic Medicine opinion dated 15 October 2013 shows that Avetik Petrosyan was not severely mentally disturbed in the act, nor in time of the survey. According Forensic Medicine assessment, there is no reason for a psychiatric evaluation for a decision on the issue of prison prohibited or position on the issue of forensic psychiatric care.
Probation Service has in the opinions held that the existence of a surveillance needs but proposed that the probation is not imposed because it is not clear that Avetik Petrosyan should stay in Sweden. Probation then found Avetik Petrosyan as unsuitable for community service range cookers because of lack of knowledge in Swedish and English. Avetik Petrosyan has at trial indicated that he has been granted a residence permit and that his partner is expecting a baby soon. Avetik Petrosyan has further stated that he intends to stay in Sweden and that he agrees to community service.
Avetik Petrosyan is 32 years old and he is present in the four sections of the criminal record. He was sentenced Jan. 9, 2013 to a suspended sentence coupled with fines for support (2012-10-10) and shoplifting (2012-10-10). On 26 February 2013 he was sentenced for theft (2012-07-04), said it was ordained that the previously imposed probation would also relate range cookers to the new crime. Other sections are irrelevant to the sanction assessing this question.
Store Theft is not a so-called artbrott and the district court makes no other assessment of the present theft, although Avetik Petrosyan used a folieinklädd bag at the grip. Penalty value corresponds to jail for a month. Crime type and penalty speaks thus not to prison should be selected as a penalty, which however can be the case in similar crime does.
According to the Supreme Court, the criteria for probation are perceived so that probation range cookers is excluded only if there is absolutely no reason to suppose that the sentence may help the accused refrain from further crime (cf. NJA 2000 p 314 and NJA 2008 p 359). Avetik Petrosyan suffer from certain physical diseases and mental disorders. (That is, those where we get to Sweden, ed nam). It is obvious that there is a correlation between Avetik Petrosyans social situation and his crime.
Through the findings of the district court finds common ground that there is no impediment to the execution of a sentence of probation and that a significant improvement occurred by Avetik Petrosyans social situation. At a cumulative assessment considers range cookers the district court that the reasons for probation outweighs the reason for imprisonment (relapse). Penalty should be under the specified conditions specified separately to probation. range cookers
Kalmar District Court sentenced: Avetik Petrosyan, 810,965, address, Karlskrona. Citizens range cookers of Armenia with interpreter needs in Armenian. For theft to probation. Prosecutor Kjell Janneson urged NOT to deportation Goal
No comments:
Post a Comment