er, is not entirely true, the Criminal Code, clearly delineates the

Another great example. As you know, dashing Greenpeace (and finding them at the photographer) is charged with piracy by Article 227 of the Criminal Code. Piracy us for this very article azyvaetsya "attack on the ship or riverboat for the appropriation of another's rancilio silvia property, committed with violence or threat rancilio silvia of violence." Oil platform "Prirazlomnaya" - a ship is registered in the Register of Ships of Naryan-Mar. If there was a place (as they say) the movement grinpisovtsev a collision with a boat guards, it may be likened to the threat of violence (threat need not be expressed in words.) But now assume that grinpisovtsy wanted to climb onto the platform rancilio silvia in order to capture her as property, or some other properties thereon, can only be in a trance state. The investigation therefore states that while in setting goals is not based on the testimony of the participants, and the "objective picture of the crime" (http://sledcom.ru/actual/356460/: "In the absence rancilio silvia of the suspect on the circumstances and objectives that they pursue attacking the platform, the investigation establishes the circumstances, on the basis of an objective picture of what happened. And the picture at the moment is the following: a group of people rancilio silvia on the ship Arctic Sunrise with lots of equipment, unless specified purpose, violates the 500-meter safety zone platform "Prirazlomnaja "and approaches her. Warnings move away to a safe distance are completely ignored. then, after a few boats on the water, rancilio silvia the suspects are using special equipment with which try to climb onto the platform. rancilio silvia Requirements of the authorities to stop illegal rancilio silvia actions as they have not fulfilled and, moreover, went to ram the boat, in which there were guards. consequence of all these actions is regarded as a real threat to personal safety and property of the platform, as well as resisting law enforcement "). Well, if grinpisovets climbs ahead on a fixed rig, it is not clear whether rancilio silvia this objective picture of what he is doing is likely to take possession of it as a property or some other other people's property, located on it? Well, in the course of the investigation targets can clarify ... Well, it's TFR. But here's the results of the vote nearly 30,000 people on a mail ru: http://news.mail.ru/incident/150349 81 /? Sent = 1 # articlepoll 29 percent believe that it is the "piracy" (difficult to imagine rancilio silvia that the TFR sent down here bots). In other words, the content rancilio silvia of the Criminal Code, they boldly constructed from the depths of his spirit, not looking in the UK, and the spirit they have some kind of ... podmarihuanny. rancilio silvia
Uh, there's a difference. "The attack on the ship or riverboat for the appropriation of another's property" and "But suppose that grinpisovtsy wanted to climb it in order to capture her as a possession" - a pirate can plunder the ship to climb on passengers or steal valuable cargo not in the least interested in the ship as such . 've Stole something on the rig, of course, is also pointless, but, at least, is not so unrealistic.
(No subject) - wingover Expand
er, is not entirely true, the Criminal Code, clearly delineates the "occupation of the purpose of stealing," and without it. Piracy is actually borderline option requires precedents aka plenums sun because, like theft "is taking in order to steal," and hijack "occupation without the intent to steal." In piracy no clear delineation purposes. Very interesting from a legal point of view.
I love meylrushechku, straight folk depth. The first thing that caught my eye:> The case of Khodorkovsky. The oligarchs simply took away his business. Putin is not seeded. Putin was not even aware of. However, the version that Khodorkovsky was in flip-flops in the Kremlin came and suffered for it, it is still better.
No, there can be porasscheplyat if desired. What is a "possession"? In the first place - the right to dispose of. Here I own a computer. I want to - to eat porridge, want - throw, want - selling. I want to - painted in yellow color. Greenpeace, as I understand it, would (according to them!) Deployed on the platform of advocacy and stretching her pofotat. This, as I understand it, it is currently available rancilio silvia to other people's property. Greenpeace wanted to take hold. Definitely. To dispose of it. Simple - take over temporarily. Well, that took a teenager rancilio silvia someone else's car "go", then abandoned. Even the damage is not caused. However, it still illegal.
Even more than that: they wanted rancilio silvia to usurp the right to dispose of the platform, as they wanted to keep it from working on oil according to the wishes of the owner. Prchem wanted without any court decision and obviously illegal means. So that is quite a scope for lawyers available. In general, a circle rancilio silvia is IMNO not a textbook example of a brick and a wallet, but from the same film, which declared that the spoils of the Bolshoi Theatre coat was not private, but a diplomat, you will have to pay the state, that is an entirely different article. Dokolebalis to bad people do bad Affairs